NHL makes decision on suspension for Marchand after shoving referee

In a recent controversial decision by the NHL Department of Player Safety, the enforcement of its own rules has come under intense scrutiny.

The incident in question involves Boston Bruins forward Brad Marchand, who was seen shoving a referee during a game—a move that, under normal circumstances, should automatically trigger a three-game suspension according to league guidelines.

The rules are explicit: any deliberate contact with an official is among the most severe violations, demanding swift and decisive disciplinary action. This protocol is in place not just as a punishment but as a deterrent, emphasizing the league's commitment to safeguarding its officials, who are essential for maintaining the integrity and safety of the game.

However, in the wake of the incident, the NHL seems to have sidestepped its own regulations. Marchand's action came at a moment of evident frustration—his team was losing, and he was struggling to get off the ice.


Despite the clarity of the footage and the seriousness of the offense, the NHL's response has been peculiarly lenient. The link to the video of the incident can be found here:




This apparent inconsistency in the application of rules is not just a matter of procedural oversight but strikes at the heart of the league's credibility. For a star player like Marchand to avoid suspension in a playoff series raises questions about fairness and equality before the rules—considerations that are supposed to be non-negotiable.

Toronto Maple Leafs fans might particularly feel the sting of this decision, recalling past instances like that involving Nazem Kadri, where similar concessions were notably absent.

The league's handling of this case contrasts starkly with its stated priorities and leaves fans and players alike pondering the integrity of the enforcement process. What is the point of a rule if it bends during critical moments, possibly for the sake of entertainment value or star player status? This issue is further exacerbated by another recent discussion on the topic, which can be explored here:


Such decisions not only undermine the respect for the league's governance but also tarnish the sportsmanship spirit, suggesting that some players might be ‘above the rules'.

It's a dangerous precedent, potentially inviting more such breaches in the future if not addressed with the seriousness it warrants. As the playoffs continue, all eyes will be on the NHL, not just for the on-ice action but for its commitment to fairness and justice off the ice as well.